Medical Out-of-Pocket Expenses, Poverty, and the Uninsured∗
نویسندگان
چکیده
The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) Panel on Poverty and Family Assistance argued that the current official U.S. poverty measure should be updated to capture changes in the population’s healthcare costs and needs; families with sufficiently high medical out-ofpocket (MOOP) expenditures may be ‘poor’ even though they are not counted as such. This research offers three distinct advances toward achieving the NAS recommendations as they concern MOOP spending. Firstly, this paper uses the newly collected MOOP expenditure data from the CPS ASEC, and analyzes its quality vis-à-vis alternative sources. Secondly, poverty estimates that incorporate the MOOP spending data from the CPS ASEC are produced in such a way as to be consistent with the NAS recommendations. These direct estimates are an improvement over previous estimates, conditional on obtaining high-quality data, because modeling MOOP expenditures from other surveys is not needed. Third, this paper investigates how the distribution of MOOP expenditures, and the poverty estimates, change when it is assumed that the uninsured have the spending patterns of the insured. The main results are: 1) the new MOOP expenditure data is high quality; 2) incorporating observed MOOP expenditures increases the incidence of poverty across the population by approximately two percentage points over the official measure; 3) counterfactual estimates of non-premium MOOP expenditures for the uninsured does not significantly affect poverty estimates; and 4) counterfactual estimates of premium MOOP expenditures for the uninsured exert significant upward pressure on the poverty rate. ∗This paper is released to inform interested parties of ongoing research and to encourage discussion of work in progress. Any views expressed on statistical and methodical issues are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the U.S. Census Bureau. †E-mail: [email protected] / Phone: 301 763 1271 ‡http://www.census.gov/hhes/povmeas/methodology/supplemental/research. html
منابع مشابه
The poverty-reducing effect of Medicaid.
Medicaid provides health insurance for 54 million Americans. Using the Census Bureau's Supplemental Poverty Measure (which subtracts out-of-pocket medical expenses from family resources), we estimated the impact of eliminating Medicaid. In our counterfactual, Medicaid beneficiaries would become uninsured or gain other insurance. Counterfactual medical expenditures were drawn stochastically from...
متن کاملUtilization of comprehensive health insurance scheme, Kerala: a comparative study of insured and uninsured BPL households
Introduction Comprehensive Health Insurance Scheme (CHIS) in Kerala is a modification of the national social health insurance scheme called Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY). We aimed to (a) compare the socio-demographic and health utilization pattern (outpatient and inpatient services) of below poverty line (BPL) households insured under CHIS; (b) find the percentage hospitalization covere...
متن کاملMedical Out - of - Pocket Spending Among the Uninsured : Differential Spending & the Supplemental Poverty Measure ∗
This paper refines the treatment of Medical Out-of-Pocket (MOOP) spending among the uninsured in measuring poverty, and investigates its net effect on the Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM). Unlike previous work, this research accounts for insurance coverage type in estimating counterfactual distributions of non-premium MOOP spending for the uninsured using predictive mean matching models. Addi...
متن کاملExperimental poverty measures: accounting for medical expenditures
Kathleen Short is a senior research economist, in the Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division, U.S. Census Bureau, [email protected]. Thesia I. Garner is a senior research economist in the Division of Price and Index Number Research, Bureau of Labor Statistics, [email protected]. The official measure of poverty in the United States has been in place since the 1960s and has served to i...
متن کاملHow the ACA's Health Insurance Expansions Have Affected Out-of-Pocket Cost-Sharing and Spending on Premiums.
One important benefit gained by the millions of Americans with health insurance through the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is protection from high out-of-pocket health spending. While Medicaid unambiguously reduces out-of-pocket premium and medical costs for low-income people, it is less certain that marketplace coverage and other types of insurance purchased to comply with the law's individual mand...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010